A Fluid-Dynamic-Inspired Computational Framework for Morphological and Flux-Based Analysis of Galactic Systems Using HST Archival Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2026.330184Keywords:
galactic morphology, Hubble Space Telescope, MAST archive, astronomical image analysis, fluid-dynamic analogy, flux diagnostics, computational astrophysicsAbstract
This paper presents a revised and scientifically cautious formulation of the Fluid-dynamic Morphological Model (FMM), an exploratory computational framework for flux-based analysis of galactic systems using Hubble Space Telescope archival data. The method focuses on raw or minimally processed .flt images retrieved from MAST and extracts reproducible image-level descriptors, including mean flux, peak flux, integrated flux, radial intensity profiles, residual components, nuclear concentration indices, and VDR-like activity indicators. Rather than replacing standard gravitational, photometric, spectroscopic, or cosmological interpretations, FMM is presented as a complementary image-analysis approach inspired by fluid-dynamic terminology. In this formulation, galaxy morphology and nuclear activity are examined through spatial variations in flux concentration, radial structure, and residual asymmetry, with special attention to central regions and wake-like patterns. The framework is demonstrated through a representative HST FITS dataset and compared qualitatively with standard astronomical diagnostics. The results suggest that flux-derived indicators may help organize archival galaxy images, identify regions of morphological asymmetry or enhanced activity, and select targets for deeper astrophysical modeling. The paper defines the model assumptions, diagnostic quantities, processing workflow, limitations, and reproducibility requirements. The revised interpretation emphasizes uncertainty, dimensional consistency, and compatibility with established astrophysical methods, while preserving the author’s original aim of developing an accessible and automated pipeline for exploratory analysis of galactic systems.
Downloads
References
Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J.,
Greenfield, P., Droettboom, M., Bray, E., Aldcroft, T.,
Davis, M., Ginsburg, A., Price-Whelan, A. M., Kerzendorf,
W. E., Conley, A., Crighton, N., Barbary, K., Muna, D.,
Ferguson, H., Grollier, F., Parikh, M. M., Nair, P. H.,
Streicher, O. (2013). Astropy: A community python package
for astronomy. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 558, A33.
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322068
Conselice, C. J. (2003). The relationship between stellar light
distributions of galaxies and their formation histories. The
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 147, 1–28.
Fruchter, A. S., & Hook, R. N. (2002). Drizzle: A method for
the linear reconstruction of undersampled images.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 114,
144–152. https://doi.org/10.1086/338393
Lotz, J. M., Primack, J., & Madau, P. (2004). A new
nonparametric approach to galaxy morphological
classification. The Astronomical Journal, 128, 163–182.
Massaro, A. (2026). Fmm study of galaxies and observational
models. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20638392
Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes. (2026). Hubble space
telescope archive [Accessed through MAST].
Petrosian, V. (1976). Surface brightness and evolution of
galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal, 209, L1–L5.
Sersic, J. L. (1963). Influence of the atmospheric and
instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a
galaxy. Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia,
6, 41–43.
Wells, D. C., Greisen, E. W., & Harten, R. H. (1981). Fits: A
flexible image transport system. Astronomy and
Astrophysics Supplement Series, 44, 363–37
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alex Massaro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
WorldCat
Scilit
ORCID