A Generalized Metric for the Average Distribution of Matter on Cosmological Scales: Toward an Alternative Interpretation of Cosmic Flatness?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2026.330183Keywords:
Cosmology, cosmological refractive index, critical density, Mach’s principle, G-metricAbstract
Building upon our previous studies, we introduce a generalized metric, denoted G, describing the average gravitational field of a homogeneous universe. Starting from the weak-field approximation of the Schwarzschild metric, the local gravitational contribution of an isolated mass is extended to a continuous cosmological matter distribution, leading to a global gravitational potential proportional to ρ_u R_u^2, where ρ_u is the mean cosmic density and R_u is the Hubble radius. The resulting metric naturally defines an effective cosmological refractive index. For a universe at critical density, this index is found to be exactly 2, while departures from perfect homogeneity may increase it toward approximately 2.4. We further show that incorporating the gravitational potential of the universe into the metric provides a quantitative framework connecting critical density, Mach’s principle, inertia, and the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass. Within this approach, cosmic flatness is interpreted as a natural consequence of the global gravitational structure rather than as a property requiring finely tuned initial conditions. The proposed framework offers an alternative perspective on several outstanding problems in cosmology while remaining within the weak-field approximation of general relativity. Its broader cosmological implications, including possible reinterpretations of phenomena commonly attributed to dark matter and dark energy, are discussed cautiously and presented as directions for further investigation.
Downloads
References
Assis, A. K. T. (1999). Relational mechanics. Apeiron.
Brans, C. H., & Dicke, R. H. (1961). Mach’s principle and a relativistic theory of gravitation. Physical Review, 124(3), 925–935. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.124.925
Buchert, T. (2012). Dark energy and dark matter hidden in the geometry of space? the dawn of a new paradigm in cosmology. In Dark matter and dark energy: A challenge for modern cosmology (pp. 1–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2379-5_1
Buchert, T. (2018). Is dark energy simulated by structure formation in the universe? https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09188
de Vaucouleurs, G. (1971). The large-scale distribution of galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 83(492), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1086/129080
Einstein, A. (1922). The meaning of relativity. Princeton University Press.
Fay, J. (2024). Mach’s principle and mach’s hypotheses. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 103, 58–68.
Gordon, W. (1923). Zur lichtfortpflanzung nach der relativit”atstheorie. Annalen der Physik, 72, 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19233772202
Gueorguiev, V. G., & Maeder, A. (2022). The scale-invariant vacuum paradigm: Main results and current progress. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08412
Guy, B. (2022). Review of the status of the “speed of light” and examination of some cosmological problems. https://hal.science/hal-03860051
Guy, B. (2024). A diamond universe. International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences, 14(2), 24–40.
Guy, B. (2025a). Do the many problems of contemporary cosmology have a single cause? a research program. International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences, 15(4), 37–47.
Guy, B. (2025b). On the interdependence of the values of the gravitational constant, the speed of light, mass densities, and system sizes: Study of an example. cosmological applications.https://hal.science/hal-04801046
Guy, B. (2026). The expression “speed of light” does not make sense on its own. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32617.97128
Hoefer, C. (1993). Einstein’s struggle for a machian theory of gravitation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 24(3), 287–335.
Mach, E. (1897). Die mechanik in ihrer entwicklung: Historisch-kritisch dargestellt. F. A. Brockhaus.
Maeder, A. (2023). Mond as a peculiar case of the siv theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06206
Maeder, A., & Courbin, F. (2024). Observational tests in scale invariance ii: Gravitational lensing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08379
Minazzoli, O. (2025). Les formulations d’einstein du principe de mach. https://hal.science/hal05201686
Paturel, G. (2023). The mass of our galaxy. Les Cahiers Clairaut, 183, 26–32.
Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
Schwarzschild, K. (1916). ”Uber das gravitationsfeld eines massenpunktes nach der einsteinschen theorie. Sitzungsberichte der K”oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 189–196.
Sciama, D. W. (1953). On the origin of inertia. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 113(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/113.1.34
Sciama, D. W. (1969). The physical foundations of general relativity. Doubleday.
Taillet, R., Villain, L., & Febvre, P. (2013). Dictionnaire de physique (3rd ed.). De Boeck.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bernard Guy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
WorldCat
Scilit
ORCID