A Generalized Metric for the Average Distribution of Matter ‎on Cosmological Scales: Toward an Alternative ‎Interpretation of Cosmic Flatness?‎

Authors

  • Bernard ‎Guy Independent researcher, Former Directeur de recherche at Mines Saint-Etienne, Institute Mines Télécom, Paris, France Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2026.330183

Keywords:

Cosmology, cosmological refractive index, critical density, Mach’s principle, G-metric

Abstract

Building upon our previous studies, we introduce a generalized metric, denoted G, ‎describing the average gravitational field of a homogeneous universe. Starting from the ‎weak-field approximation of the Schwarzschild metric, the local gravitational contribution ‎of an isolated mass is extended to a continuous cosmological matter distribution, leading ‎to a global gravitational potential proportional to ρ_u R_u^2, where ρ_u is the mean cosmic ‎density and R_u is the Hubble radius. The resulting metric naturally defines an effective ‎cosmological refractive index. For a universe at critical density, this index is found to be ‎exactly 2, while departures from perfect homogeneity may increase it toward approximately ‎‎2.4. We further show that incorporating the gravitational potential of the universe into the ‎metric provides a quantitative framework connecting critical density, Mach’s principle, ‎inertia, and the equivalence of inertial and gravitational mass. Within this approach, ‎cosmic flatness is interpreted as a natural consequence of the global gravitational structure ‎rather than as a property requiring finely tuned initial conditions. The proposed framework ‎offers an alternative perspective on several outstanding problems in cosmology while ‎remaining within the weak-field approximation of general relativity. Its broader ‎cosmological implications, including possible reinterpretations of phenomena commonly ‎attributed to dark matter and dark energy, are discussed cautiously and presented as ‎directions for further investigation.‎

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

References

Assis, A. K. T. (1999). Relational mechanics. Apeiron.‎

Brans, C. H., & Dicke, R. H. (1961). Mach’s principle and a ‎relativistic theory of gravitation. Physical Review, 124(3), ‎‎925–935. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.124.925‎

Buchert, T. (2012). Dark energy and dark matter hidden in ‎the geometry of space? the dawn of a new paradigm in ‎cosmology. In Dark matter and dark energy: A challenge ‎for modern cosmology (pp. 1–50). Springer. ‎https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2379-5_1‎

Buchert, T. (2018). Is dark energy simulated by structure ‎formation in the universe? ‎https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.09188‎

de Vaucouleurs, G. (1971). The large-scale distribution of ‎galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Publications of the ‎Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 83(492), 113–143. ‎https://doi.org/10.1086/129080‎

Einstein, A. (1922). The meaning of relativity. Princeton ‎University Press.‎

Fay, J. (2024). Mach’s principle and mach’s hypotheses. ‎Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 103, 58–68.‎

Gordon, W. (1923). Zur lichtfortpflanzung nach der ‎relativit”atstheorie. Annalen der Physik, 72, 421–456. ‎https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19233772202‎

Gueorguiev, V. G., & Maeder, A. (2022). The scale-invariant ‎vacuum paradigm: Main results and current progress. ‎https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08412‎

Guy, B. (2022). Review of the status of the “speed of light” ‎and examination of some cosmological problems. ‎https://hal.science/hal-03860051‎

Guy, B. (2024). A diamond universe. International Journal of ‎Fundamental Physical Sciences, 14(2), 24–40.‎

Guy, B. (2025a). Do the many problems of contemporary ‎cosmology have a single cause? a research program. ‎International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences, ‎‎15(4), 37–47.‎

Guy, B. (2025b). On the interdependence of the values of the ‎gravitational constant, the speed of light, mass densities, ‎and system sizes: Study of an example. cosmological ‎applications.https://hal.science/hal-04801046‎

Guy, B. (2026). The expression “speed of light” does not ‎make sense on its own. ‎https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32617.97128‎

Hoefer, C. (1993). Einstein’s struggle for a machian theory of ‎gravitation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ‎Part A, 24(3), 287–335.‎

Mach, E. (1897). Die mechanik in ihrer entwicklung: ‎Historisch-kritisch dargestellt. F. A. Brockhaus.‎

Maeder, A. (2023). Mond as a peculiar case of the siv theory. ‎https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06206‎

Maeder, A., & Courbin, F. (2024). Observational tests in scale ‎invariance ii: Gravitational lensing. ‎https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08379‎

Minazzoli, O. (2025). Les formulations d’einstein du principe ‎de mach. https://hal.science/hal05201686‎

Paturel, G. (2023). The mass of our galaxy. Les Cahiers ‎Clairaut, 183, 26–32.‎

Planck Collaboration. (2020). Planck 2018 results. vi. ‎cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, ‎A6. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910‎

Schwarzschild, K. (1916). ”Uber das gravitationsfeld eines ‎massenpunktes nach der einsteinschen theorie. ‎Sitzungsberichte der K”oniglich Preussischen Akademie der ‎Wissenschaften, 189–196.‎

Sciama, D. W. (1953). On the origin of inertia. Monthly ‎Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 113(1), 34–42. ‎https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/113.1.34‎

Sciama, D. W. (1969). The physical foundations of general ‎relativity. Doubleday.‎

Taillet, R., Villain, L., & Febvre, P. (2013). Dictionnaire de ‎physique (3rd ed.). De Boeck.‎

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Generalized Metric for the Average Distribution of Matter ‎on Cosmological Scales: Toward an Alternative ‎Interpretation of Cosmic Flatness?‎ (B. ‎ Guy, Trans.). (2026). International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences, 16(2), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2026.330183

Similar Articles

1-10 of 117

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.